The Strife and Crimes of Charlie Johns

Defying Defamation for exposing the zionist criminals in Wingecarribee Shire Council. All articles have been copied and pasted from social media pages without permission.
User avatar
Admin
Posts: 570
Joined: Tue May 17, 2016 9:47 pm
Contact:

The Strife and Crimes of Charlie Johns

Postby Admin » Wed Mar 03, 2021 9:11 pm

The Strife and Crimes of Charlie Johns
(Bonus documentary evidence in the comments section)
In the lead up to the 2012 elections, one of the local crooks running for council approached John Uliana and offered to pay for his entire election campaign. He also promised to do everything in his power to get Uliana elected as part of their coalition.
But there was a catch.
“Most of the time you can vote anyway you want, but on certain motions you must vote the way the coalition decides.”
John Uliana thanked them for the opportunity, but politely declined. He was running his own race, he said. There was no way he was going to team up with what was commonly known as the Bowral Mafia.
From that time forward, and after Uliana was elected to council, the mafia and their evil henchman, Charlie Johns, attacked the first time councillor at every opportunity.
In fact, the long running vendetta against Uliana lasted the 4 years of his council term.
Charlie Johns’ role in the witch-hunt was his usual modus operandi. 1. Stitch up Uliana with fabricated charges of unlawful conduct and behaviour. 2. Use council meetings and the Questions from the Public section to accuse Uliana of committing crimes. 3. Continue to bully and intimidate Uliana with more and more allegations of crime, and hound him relentlessly for months, even years, if necessary.
They constantly harassed Uliana in an attempt to have him sacked as a councillor, just so they’d have the balance of power in the end.
This all happened between 2012 and 2016.
As part of the vendetta, Charlie Johns perpetuated the rumour that Uliana had asbestos on his Gibraltar Hotel golf course in an attempt to have Uliana’s business shut down. When that didn’t work, Charlie Johns proceeded to smear Uliana’s name in the local media about the asbestos issue, calling on the council and authorities to take action. While he was vilifying Uliana in the public domain, Charlie Johns was putting questions to council at literally every council meeting (around 20 meetings per year).
The questions were either directed to Uliana about the fake asbestos issue, or they were questioning the council as to why they weren’t investigating Uliana about the alleged asbestos on his land.
In the end, and following an exhaustive investigation costing upwards of $50,000, there was no asbestos.
Charlie Johns had perpetuated a lie.
He’d attacked Uliana relentlessly, and even after 4 years of baseless allegations of wrongdoing, John Uliana was never once found to have breached the council’s strict code of conduct regulations, and he was never investigated by the police for any matter whatsoever.
Councillor Uliana had done nothing wrong.
In another attempt to destroy his political career, the crooks tried to stitch up Uliana for illegal earthworks that allegedly took place on a property he owned on Range Rd, Mittagong. In fact, the illegal earthworks occurred on a neighbouring property, and had nothing to do with Uliana.
Once again, Charlie Johns and Co perpetrated a vicious rumour, and once again, Charlie Johns attempted to hold Uliana to account via a smear campaign which included constant questioning of the matter at council meetings.
The Bowral Mafia undertook a witch-hunt against the neighbour responsible for the illegal earthworks, but their intention was to stitch Uliana up in another attempt to have him sacked from council.
The attached meeting minute is a good example of Charlie Johns’ modus operandi.
(It should be noted that after 4 years of allegations about the illegal earthworks, John Uliana was totally exonerated in the end, and the accusations of criminal activity against Uliana were proven to be totally unfounded. They were a complete fabrication).
WSC Council Meeting – 24 July, 2013 – Questions from the Public.
1. Mr Charlie Johns
“Regarding legal issues and at the 8 May, 2013 Council reports spending almost $35,000 on legal costs relating to excavations at Range Road Mittagong,” Charlie Johns began as part of his statement/question (see attached pic). “I have an email from Joe Lorincz of Spring Hill, a neighbouring property claiming damage to his property from these excavations,” stated Charlie. “A title search of the properties confirms Mr Lorincz claims the excavations, the storage of some 50,000 tonnes of soil and the removal of a large number of trees, are actually on Cl John Uliana’s property.”
But let’s stop here for a moment.
Sure enough, there had been illegal earthworks at the time, but it had nothing to do with John Uliana, and it concerned a neighbouring property. Charlie Johns’ question from the gallery was fabricated, and he blatantly mislead the council by saying the illegal earthworks were Uliana’s responsibility.
They weren’t, and Charlie Johns lied to try and implicate Uliana in something illegal.
Charlie Johns stated that 50,000 tons of earth had been stored on Uliana’s land.
Another lie. In fact, the neighbour responsible for the illegal earthworks dumped the 50,000 tons of dirt on both Uliana’s property and that of Joe Lorincz’s. Uliana was a victim of the illegal movement of earthworks, as was Lorincz.
Charlie Johns also stated that Uliana had illegally removed a number of large trees and further alleged that he didn’t have a DA in place to cut down the trees .
More lies.
Charlie Johns ended the question by alleging that Uliana was selling the property, and as part of the contract of sale, Uliana had agreed to undertake illegal earthworks and the removal of large trees. In fact, Charlie Johns and Co placed an unlawful caveat on the property, and not only did it impact Uliana’s attempt to sell the Range Rd residence, it ended up devaluing the property because of the caveat.
These were the type of lies Charlie Johns was perpetuating at the time, and at no stage did Johns provide any evidence of Uliana acting unlawfully.
It was a brazen attempt to deprive the council of John Uliana’s ability to vote in the best interests of the community, and it was a blatant attempt by Johns to have Uliana charged for a crime he didn’t commit.
And it was all based on lies concocted by Charlie Johns and Co.
In 2018, I confronted Charlie Johns with evidence of his long-term corruption, including details of his attempt to frame John Uliana. A month later I was arrested for stalking and intimidation, after Johns made false and misleading statements to Hume District Police Division (and he did so with the full support of a handful of corrupt officers, the same bent cops who’d been protecting members of the Bowral Mafia for years).
Charlie lied to the police in an attempt to have me framed. He lied to the court. And I got convicted for a crime I didn’t commit.
Charlie Johns is dead, and the Highlands is now free of the most notorious crook this community has ever known.
He was evil, and he would stop at nothing to destroy a person’s reputation, their career, and their life if necessary.
If you’ve suffered a similar injustice because of Charlie Johns’ corruption, I want to hear your story.
Please call Adam Greenwood on 0409 871 763.
As an investigative reporter, I can guarantee your anonymity, and I never reveal my sources.
Now that Charlie Johns is no more, the Highlands’ needs to hold him to account.
Check out the comments section for further documentary evidence of Charlie attempting to frame Councillor Uliana for crimes he didn’t commit.
It should also be noted that at the bottom of the attached council meeting minute, there’s the following statement – ‘Mr Charlie Johns offered two additional questions that were ruled out of order by the Mayor’. The questions by Johns would’ve been considered harassment (and that’s why they were rejected), or they would’ve been vexatious or malicious.
This was the modus operandi of Charlie Johns.
Bully, threaten and intimidate.
He was the main standover man for the Bowral Mafia.
Government is Organized Crime. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. UCC 1-308

User avatar
Admin
Posts: 570
Joined: Tue May 17, 2016 9:47 pm
Contact:

Re: The Strife and Crimes of Charlie Johns

Postby Admin » Wed Mar 03, 2021 9:12 pm

Two years into the 2012-2016 council term and the crooks weren't having much luck in trying to frame Uliana for asbestos contamination and illegal earthworks, so they tried another dirty trick.
On 23 July, 2014, they attempted to bully Uliana into quitting council using dubious statistics that falsely claimed he’d failed in his role as councillor.
The attached request for Uliana to resign was put together by Charlie Johns (in all likelihood). Over the years, Johns had submitted scores of complaints using similar facts and figures to harass and malign people. In this instance, the mafia would’ve called on Charlie to “trawl through the attendance notices so that we can try and get Uliana sacked for never turning up to committee meetings”. Or words to that effect.
For many years, Charlie Johns used similar tactics in the dozens of poison pen letters he wrote to councillors and business people. For instance, in an attempt to bully and intimidate our shire leaders, Johns would anonymously contact the elected official and menace them with threats to their political careers and livelihood.
A prominent victim of Charlie’s poison pen letter campaign was Jim Mauger, a councillor from 2004 - 2012. Over a two year period, Charlie sent Jim numerous anonymous letters – with dire threats – if he didn’t stop complaining about council corruption.
Clr Mauger contacted the police about the poison pen letters, and when officers arrived at Jim’s place to investigate, he provided them with evidence of Charlie’s illegal conduct (threatening an elected official with menace). Unfortunately for Jim (and the Southern Highlands’ community in general), the senior constable in charge of investigating the matter was a bent cop, and rather than undertaking a fully fledged investigation based on probable cause, the crooked constable whitewashed the complaint, effectively covering it up forever. In fact, the same officer was contacted by Jim on two more occasions (when he wanted to complain about further threats by Johns), and sure enough, those complaints were also left hanging.
They were never properly investigated.
In 2018, Johns conspired with a corrupt officer at Hume District Police Division by having me charged and convicted for a crime I didn’t commit.
The same officer was the senior constable who failed to properly investigate Jim Mauger’s complaints against Charlie Johns five years earlier.
One moment the senior constable is protecting Charlie Johns from investigation after a complaint by a councillor.
The next, she’s charging a journalist for a crime based on a complaint made by Charlie Johns.
No wonder the local police division failed to properly investigate my own complaints of police corruption involving Charlie Johns. The evidence was so overwhelming, it was either bring in the Professional Standards Division to investigate the matter (thereby exposing the true extent of corruption at the Hume District Police Division), or whitewash and cover-up the complaints by Adam Greenwood (while also stitching him up on further fabricated charges).
The NSW Police Force chose the latter option.
Attachments
141175698_896877251069362_8901279628926023528_o.jpg
141175698_896877251069362_8901279628926023528_o.jpg (270.39 KiB) Viewed 1800 times
Government is Organized Crime. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. UCC 1-308

User avatar
Admin
Posts: 570
Joined: Tue May 17, 2016 9:47 pm
Contact:

Re: The Strife and Crimes of Charlie Johns

Postby Admin » Wed Mar 03, 2021 9:12 pm

The Uliana-Gate article was published 5 years ago.
It proves that Charlie Johns engaged in corrupt conduct in conjunction with other corrupt individuals.
Even though Charlie Johns was outed for acting criminally, nothing happened. Colleagues of Councillor Uliana should've spoken out about the witch-hunt Charlie Johns conducted against Uliana, but none of them ever did.
Clr Larry Whipper never said a word.
Clr Ian Scandrett remained mute.
Clr Holly Campbell was suspiciously quiet.
Clr Jim Clarke was silent.
And Clr Graham McLaughlin was part of the witch-hunt.
The full page article contains an email sent by Charlie Johns to a handful of the crooks (including Clr McLaughlin). In the email, Johns admits to breaking the law –
"Mean while (sic) John Uliana is the weak link at council. We need to keep the pressure on to add to his current self made problems & pressures & maybe there will be a bi-election anyway." (Charlie Johns alludes to Uliana's self made problems that were actually caused by Charlie Johns himself, as part of a vendetta by the Bowral Mafia. The mafia want to force a by-election so that the crooked coalition can regain control of council. The type of conduct Charlie Johns is advocating for constitutes systemic corruption – and this is a crime according to the ICAC Act of 1988).
"John (Uliana) was never going to vote with us, look what happened with the Committees, he was told how to vote. Lets see what happens when the report on asbestos on the golf course property comes up. Remember its always about John." (In fact, it was actually about the Bowral Mafia regaining control of the council. Charlie Johns admits that Uliana was confronted about voting with the crooked coalition, which Uliana refused to do. There was no asbestos found on Uliana's property after an exhaustive investigation by council, and at a cost of $50,000, but at the time of this article being published, Charlie Johns and Co were still hoping that asbestos would be found, something they could use against Uliana in attempt to have him removed from council. Johns admission that Uliana "was told how to vote" constitutes a crime according to the ICAC Act of 1988).
It should be noted that the email written by Charlie Johns was addressed to the following crooks –
Councillor Graham McLaughlin
Former mayor and councillor, Nick Campbell-Jones
Long term supporter of the crooks, Terry Oaks-Ash
Attachments
141094278_1830798863741883_1133273557143076063_o.jpg
141094278_1830798863741883_1133273557143076063_o.jpg (484.74 KiB) Viewed 1800 times
Government is Organized Crime. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. UCC 1-308

User avatar
Admin
Posts: 570
Joined: Tue May 17, 2016 9:47 pm
Contact:

Re: The Strife and Crimes of Charlie Johns

Postby Admin » Wed Mar 03, 2021 9:13 pm

From the very beginning of John Uliana's term of office, the Bowral Mafia went after the freshman councillor with a vengeance. There was no asbestos on the golf course leased by Clr Uliana.
As it states in the original motion, the alleged asbestos was an operational matter and would only be reported back to the General Manager if the matter was warranted. It wasn't. There was no asbestos.
At the start of the witch-hunt against Uliana, Ian Scandrett was one of the crooks (after being coerced into joining their ranks at the beginning of his term). This is why Ian added an amendment to the attached motion "that all files relating to the property ... be made available to Councillors". Clr Scandrett was instructed by the mafia to secure as much information about Uliana's property as possible, so that the crooks had more opportunities to stitch Uliana up as part of the vendetta. The amendment was voted down, and Scandrett was recorded as being a dissenting vote "in respect of this motion". It wasn't enough that he was supporting a motion to frame a fellow councillor for something he didn't do, he wanted his unlawful attempt to frame Uliana to be recorded for all the world to see, even though his motion failed.
In the most amazing irony, Scandrett and the Bowral Mafia ended up having a major falling out, and for most of the council term 2016 to 2020, Clr Scandrett was the victim of a witch-hunt by the very crooks he'd initially jumped in bed with. But even though Scandrett was subjected to years of abuse by the mafia, he never once raised the matter of John Uliana being the victim of a witch-hunt.
That's because Ian Scandrett's role in the Uliana witch-hunt would come to light if he raised the matter in open council.
Attachments
141878819_896786734411747_4587409517372956588_o.jpg
141878819_896786734411747_4587409517372956588_o.jpg (305.06 KiB) Viewed 1800 times
Government is Organized Crime. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. UCC 1-308


Return to “Defying Defamation”



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron